shot: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	projectile Weight: 0.63 , photograph Weight: 0.59 , mistake Weight: 0.57 , story Weight: 0.57
Siblings	volley Weight: 0.61 , forehand Weight: 0.60 , overhead Weight: 0.60 , blast Weight: 0.57 , lob Weight: 0.52

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
be expensive at bars	0.78
be considered cost	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(shot, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(photograph, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(photograph, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(photograph, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(shot, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(overhead, be considered cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Salient(shot, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(shot, be expensive at bars)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(shot, be expensive at bars)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Plausible(shot, be expensive at bars)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(shot, be expensive at bars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Salient(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(shot, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(shot, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(photograph, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(overhead, be considered cost)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.97

Typical(shot, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(photograph, is expensive)