shredder: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.57
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.52
, item
Weight: 0.50
, equipment
Weight: 0.49
, device
Weight: 0.47
Siblings time machine
Weight: 0.32
, blender
Weight: 0.32
, fax machine
Weight: 0.32
, garbage truck
Weight: 0.32
, garbage can
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality evil 0.80
is bad guy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(shredder, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(device, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(blender, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(blender, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(device, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(shredder, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(blender, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(blender, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(fax machine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(fax machine, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(blender, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(blender, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(shredder, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shredder, has quality good)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(shredder, has quality good)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shredder, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shredder, has quality evil)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(shredder, has quality evil)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shredder, is bad guy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(shredder, is bad guy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(shredder, has quality evil)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(shredder, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(shredder, is bad guy)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(shredder, has quality evil)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(shredder, is bad guy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(shredder, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(blender, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(fax machine, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(blender, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(shredder, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(device, has quality good)