shrimp: be considered dirty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seafood
Weight: 0.72
, shellfish
Weight: 0.70
, bait
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.39
, crab
Weight: 0.38
, oyster
Weight: 0.38
, crawfish
Weight: 0.37
, mackerel
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered dirty 1.00
be considered unclean 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(shellfish, be considered unclean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shrimp, be considered dirty)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(shellfish, be considered unclean)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, be considered unclean)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(shellfish, be considered unclean) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be considered dirty)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(shrimp, be considered dirty)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be considered unclean)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(shrimp, be considered unclean)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be considered unclean)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(shrimp, be considered unclean)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be considered dirty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shrimp, be considered dirty)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(shellfish, be considered unclean)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(shrimp, be considered dirty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(shellfish, be considered unclean)