shrubs: has physical part roots

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tree
Weight: 0.42
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.32
, maple tree
Weight: 0.32
, cherry tree
Weight: 0.32
, ficus
Weight: 0.32
, chestnut tree
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part roots 1.00
have long roots 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(tree, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(shrubs, has physical part roots)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(tree, has physical part roots)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(tree, has physical part roots)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(tree, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(shrubs, has physical part roots)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(shrubs, has physical part roots)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(shrubs, have long roots)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(shrubs, have long roots)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(shrubs, have long roots)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(shrubs, have long roots)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(shrubs, has physical part roots)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(shrubs, has physical part roots)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tree, has physical part roots)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(shrubs, has physical part roots)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tree, has physical part roots)