sibling: have similar names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents relationship
Weight: 0.63
, child
Weight: 0.63
, relative
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sister
Weight: 0.35
, daughter
Weight: 0.34
, parent
Weight: 0.34
, uncle
Weight: 0.33
, boy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have similar names 1.00
names 0.89
have similar personalities 0.80
look similar 0.79
have similar voices 0.77
have similar physical characteristics 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sister, look similar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sister, look similar)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(sister, look similar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(sibling, have similar names)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sibling, names)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sibling, names)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(sibling, names)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(sibling, have similar physical characteristics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(sibling, have similar personalities)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(sibling, have similar personalities)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sibling, have similar physical characteristics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(sibling, names)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(sibling, have similar physical characteristics)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(sibling, have similar personalities)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sibling, look similar)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sibling, have similar personalities)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sibling, look similar)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(sibling, have similar voices)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sibling, look similar)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(sibling, have similar voices)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sibling, have similar voices)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(sibling, have similar voices)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look similar)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sibling, have similar physical characteristics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sibling, have similar names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(sibling, have similar names)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sibling, have similar names)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(sister, look similar)