sibling: look better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents relationship
Weight: 0.63
, child
Weight: 0.63
, relative
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sister
Weight: 0.35
, daughter
Weight: 0.34
, parent
Weight: 0.34
, uncle
Weight: 0.33
, boy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
look better 1.00
look different 0.89
look similar 0.84
is best looking 0.82
look older 0.81
get treated better 0.78
get more love 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sister, look different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sister, look similar)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(sister, look different)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(sister, look different)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sister, look similar)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(sister, look similar)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(sibling, look better)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sibling, look different)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sibling, look different)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look different)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look different)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sibling, look different)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sibling, look different)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(sibling, look older)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(sibling, look older)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look older)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sibling, look different)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sibling, look different)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sibling, look older)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sibling, look similar)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sibling, look similar)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sibling, look similar)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sibling, get more love)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sibling, is best looking)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(sibling, get more love)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sibling, get treated better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(sibling, is best looking)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sibling, is best looking)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sibling, get treated better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sibling, get treated better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sibling, get treated better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sibling, is best looking)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sibling, get more love)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(sibling, get more love)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look similar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sibling, look better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sister, look different)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look better)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(sister, look similar)