sickle cell anemia: be more common in regions

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hemolytic anemia
Weight: 0.80
, red blood cell
Weight: 0.74
, disease
Weight: 0.72
, anemia
Weight: 0.70
, condition
Weight: 0.68
Siblings lyme disease
Weight: 0.37
, pelvic inflammatory disease
Weight: 0.37
, thalassemia
Weight: 0.36
, polycythemia
Weight: 0.36
, macular degeneration
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more common in regions 1.00
be more common in regions of world 0.98
be more common in certain regions 0.97
be more common in certain regions of world 0.96
is more common 0.87
be common in places 0.86
is more common now 0.85
is common 0.82
is common now 0.82
be most common in individuals 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(thalassemia, is common)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(thalassemia, is common)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(thalassemia, is common)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions of world)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in certain regions of world)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in certain regions)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions of world)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in certain regions)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in certain regions of world)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions of world)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions of world)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be common in places)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, is common)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, be common in places)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in certain regions)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be common in places)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, is more common now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, is common)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in certain regions of world)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, is common)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, is more common now)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in certain regions)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be common in places)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, be most common in individuals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be most common in individuals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in certain regions of world)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, is more common now)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, is common)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, is more common now)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be most common in individuals)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be most common in individuals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in regions)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(thalassemia, is common)