sickle cell anemia: be more prevalent in american population

Property	Similarity
be more prevalent in american population	1.00
be more prevalent in african american population	0.96
be more prevalent in african population	0.95
be more prevalent in population	0.95
is prevalent	0.86
be prevalent in africa	0.86
be more common than america	0.84
be more common in africa	0.80
affect african american	0.78
be more common in african descent	0.77

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, is prevalent)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be prevalent in africa)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in african american population)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common than america)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in african american population)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, affect african american)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, is prevalent)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in african american population)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in african american population)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in african descent)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be prevalent in africa)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common than america)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be more common in africa)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, affect african american)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, is prevalent)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in african descent)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, be prevalent in africa)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.57

Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be more common in africa)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common than america)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, affect african american)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in african descent)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.56

Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(sickle cell anemia, be more common in africa)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in africa)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common than america)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be prevalent in africa)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, is prevalent)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more common in african descent)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.45

Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be more prevalent in american population) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, affect african american)

Parents	hemolytic anemia Weight: 0.80 , red blood cell Weight: 0.74 , disease Weight: 0.72 , anemia Weight: 0.70 , condition Weight: 0.68
Siblings	lyme disease Weight: 0.37 , pelvic inflammatory disease Weight: 0.37 , thalassemia Weight: 0.36 , polycythemia Weight: 0.36 , macular degeneration Weight: 0.35

sickle cell anemia: be more prevalent in american population

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings