sidewalk: be designed with cracks between slabs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pavement
Weight: 0.65
, place
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.60
Siblings street
Weight: 0.35
, driveway
Weight: 0.35
, alley
Weight: 0.35
, plaza
Weight: 0.35
, intersection
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be designed with cracks between slabs 1.00
be designed with cracks 0.91
have built in cracks 0.87
is made with cracks 0.86
have cracks 0.85
be constructed with spaces between sections 0.79
be built with spaces between section 0.76
have seams joints 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, have built in cracks)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, have built in cracks)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(sidewalk, have built in cracks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, is made with cracks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, have cracks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(sidewalk, is made with cracks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, is made with cracks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be constructed with spaces between sections)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be constructed with spaces between sections)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, have cracks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be built with spaces between section)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be built with spaces between section)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(sidewalk, have cracks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, have seams joints)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, have seams joints)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sidewalk, have built in cracks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(sidewalk, have seams joints)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be constructed with spaces between sections)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(sidewalk, is made with cracks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be built with spaces between section)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be constructed with spaces between sections)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be built with spaces between section)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sidewalk, have seams joints)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(sidewalk, have cracks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be designed with cracks between slabs)