sidewalk: be in miami red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pavement
Weight: 0.65
, place
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.60
Siblings street
Weight: 0.35
, driveway
Weight: 0.35
, alley
Weight: 0.35
, plaza
Weight: 0.35
, intersection
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in miami red 1.00
be wet on csi miami 0.92
is nyc 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(alley, is nyc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(alley, is nyc)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(alley, is nyc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be in miami red)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be wet on csi miami)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be wet on csi miami)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be wet on csi miami)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be wet on csi miami)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, is nyc)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sidewalk, is nyc)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, is nyc)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(sidewalk, is nyc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be in miami red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Plausible(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be in miami red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be in miami red)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(alley, is nyc)