sidewalk: be used to pedestrian traffic

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pavement
Weight: 0.65
, place
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.60
Siblings street
Weight: 0.35
, driveway
Weight: 0.35
, alley
Weight: 0.35
, intersection
Weight: 0.34
, patio
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to traffic and pedestrian 1.00
be used to pedestrian traffic 1.00
be used to pedestrian 0.96
be at freeway 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pavement, be at freeway)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pavement, be at freeway)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pavement, be at freeway)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(street, be used to traffic and pedestrian)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(pavement, be at freeway)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(street, be used to traffic and pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(street, be used to traffic and pedestrian)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pavement, be at freeway)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(street, be used to traffic and pedestrian)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pavement, be at freeway)