siemens: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents company
Weight: 0.63
, giant
Weight: 0.59
, manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, brand
Weight: 0.56
, vendor
Weight: 0.55
Siblings motorola
Weight: 0.34
, software company
Weight: 0.34
, netscape
Weight: 0.34
, ericsson
Weight: 0.33
, philips
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vendor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(siemens, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(vendor, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(vendor, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(software company, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(philips, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vendor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(siemens, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(philips, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(philips, has quality worth)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(software company, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(software company, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(siemens, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(siemens, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(siemens, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(siemens, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(siemens, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(siemens, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(siemens, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vendor, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(philips, has quality worth)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(software company, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(siemens, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vendor, has quality bad)