sign language: is beneficial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.64
, activity
Weight: 0.63
, expression
Weight: 0.63
, language
Weight: 0.63
Siblings american sign language
Weight: 0.91
, dialect
Weight: 0.58
, english language
Weight: 0.41
, programming language
Weight: 0.41
, chinese language
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
is beneficial 1.00
be beneficial 1.00
is useful 0.81
is effective 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expression, is useful)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sign language, is beneficial)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(expression, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(expression, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(expression, is useful)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(sign language, is beneficial)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(sign language, is beneficial)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sign language, be beneficial)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sign language, be beneficial)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(sign language, be beneficial)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(sign language, be beneficial)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(sign language, is useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sign language, is useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sign language, is effective)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sign language, is effective)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(sign language, is effective)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sign language, is useful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sign language, is effective)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(sign language, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sign language, is beneficial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sign language, is beneficial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(expression, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(sign language, is beneficial)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(expression, is useful)