sign: be at state park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents step
Weight: 0.60
, mark
Weight: 0.60
, word
Weight: 0.60
, demonstration
Weight: 0.60
Siblings stop sign
Weight: 0.84
, street sign
Weight: 0.68
, table
Weight: 0.62
, statue
Weight: 0.61
, wrinkle
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at state park 1.00
be at park 0.91
be at central park 0.83
be at city 0.80
state feel 0.79
be at town 0.77
be at any city 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(word, state feel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sign, be at state park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(word, state feel)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(word, state feel)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at state park)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at park)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at central park)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(statue, be at city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(word, state feel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(sign, be at state park)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(statue, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(statue, be at state park)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(statue, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(statue, be at park)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(statue, be at central park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(statue, be at central park)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(statue, be at city) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(statue, be at city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sign, be at state park)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(sign, be at city)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(sign, be at town)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(sign, be at any city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sign, be at city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sign, be at town)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(sign, be at any city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at any city)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at town)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at city)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(sign, be at town)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sign, be at city)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sign, be at any city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at state park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sign, be at state park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(word, state feel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(statue, be at state park)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(statue, be at park)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(statue, be at central park)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(statue, be at city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(sign, be at state park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(word, state feel)