sign: be important in communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents signal
Weight: 0.69
, building
Weight: 0.60
, step
Weight: 0.60
, mark
Weight: 0.60
Siblings stop sign
Weight: 0.84
, american sign language
Weight: 0.76
, street sign
Weight: 0.68
, reading
Weight: 0.64
, table
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in communication 1.00
be important for business 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(building, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sign, be important in communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(building, be important for business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(building, be important for business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(building, be important for business)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(sign, be important in communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(sign, be important in communication)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(sign, be important for business)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sign, be important for business)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(sign, be important for business)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(sign, be important for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sign, be important in communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sign, be important in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(building, be important for business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(sign, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(building, be important for business)