silence: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prayer
Weight: 0.60
, language
Weight: 0.60
, answer
Weight: 0.59
, word
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sign language
Weight: 0.31
, english language
Weight: 0.31
, shame
Weight: 0.31
, f word
Weight: 0.31
, italian language
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality noise 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prayer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(silence, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(silence, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(silence, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(prayer, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(language, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(prayer, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(shame, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(english language, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sign language, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shame, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(f word, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(prayer, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silence, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silence, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silence, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(shame, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(shame, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(shame, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(shame, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(sign language, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sign language, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(f word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(f word, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(english language, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(english language, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(silence, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(silence, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(silence, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(silence, has quality noise)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(silence, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(silence, has quality noise)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality noise)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(silence, has quality noise)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
Salient(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(silence, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(prayer, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(shame, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sign language, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(english language, has quality good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(shame, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(f word, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(prayer, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)