silica: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.67
, substance
Weight: 0.62
, mineral
Weight: 0.61
, ingredient
Weight: 0.59
, compound
Weight: 0.58
Siblings magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.38
, hydrogen sulfide
Weight: 0.37
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.37
, titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.37
, silicate
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(silicate, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(silicate, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(silicate, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(titanium dioxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(magnesium oxide, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(silica, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(silica, has quality bad)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(silica, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(silica, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(silica, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(silica, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(silica, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(titanium dioxide, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(silicate, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(silica, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(magnesium oxide, has quality bad)