silicon: be good choice making in electronic devices

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents semiconductor
Weight: 0.75
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.69
, mineral
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, substrate
Weight: 0.62
Siblings germanium
Weight: 0.39
, transistor
Weight: 0.38
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.36
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.36
, iron oxide
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good choice making in electronic devices 1.00
be important to electronic devices 0.92
be widely used in electronic devices 0.89
be important to devices 0.85
is devices 0.84
is non-ohmic devices 0.84
is device 0.79
be used in today 's electronics 0.78
is low device 0.78
be important to computer technology 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(semiconductor, be important to electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(semiconductor, be important to devices)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(semiconductor, is devices)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(semiconductor, is non-ohmic devices)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(semiconductor, be important to computer technology)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(semiconductor, be used in today 's electronics)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(semiconductor, is non-ohmic devices)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(semiconductor, is devices)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(semiconductor, be important to electronic devices)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(semiconductor, be used in today 's electronics)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(semiconductor, be important to devices)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(semiconductor, be important to computer technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(semiconductor, is non-ohmic devices)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(semiconductor, be important to computer technology)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(semiconductor, be important to devices)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(semiconductor, be important to electronic devices)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(semiconductor, is devices)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(semiconductor, be used in today 's electronics)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(transistor, is low device)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be important to computer technology)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(transistor, is device)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(semiconductor, be important to electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(semiconductor, be important to devices)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(semiconductor, is devices)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(semiconductor, is non-ohmic devices)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(semiconductor, be used in today 's electronics)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(semiconductor, be important to computer technology)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(transistor, is device)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(transistor, is device)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(transistor, be important to computer technology)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(transistor, be important to computer technology)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(transistor, is low device)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(transistor, is low device)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(silicon, be widely used in electronic devices)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be widely used in electronic devices)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(silicon, be widely used in electronic devices)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(silicon, be widely used in electronic devices)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(semiconductor, be important to electronic devices)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(semiconductor, is devices)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(semiconductor, be used in today 's electronics)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(semiconductor, be important to devices)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(semiconductor, is non-ohmic devices)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(semiconductor, be important to computer technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(transistor, is device)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(transistor, be important to computer technology)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(transistor, is low device)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(semiconductor, be important to electronic devices)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(semiconductor, is devices)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(semiconductor, be used in today 's electronics)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(semiconductor, be important to devices)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(semiconductor, is non-ohmic devices)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(silicon, be good choice making in electronic devices)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(semiconductor, be important to computer technology)