silkworm: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents caterpillar
Weight: 0.63
, human cell
Weight: 0.52
, organism
Weight: 0.50
, insect
Weight: 0.49
, band
Weight: 0.44
Siblings dung beetle
Weight: 0.33
, aphid
Weight: 0.33
, honey bee
Weight: 0.32
, protozoan
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
be beneficial to man 0.75
be helpful to humans 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(insect, be beneficial to man)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(silkworm, is harmful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(insect, be beneficial to man)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(insect, be beneficial to man)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dung beetle, is harmful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is harmful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(insect, be beneficial to man)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(silkworm, is harmful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(aphid, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(aphid, is harmful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(dung beetle, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dung beetle, is harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(silkworm, is harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(silkworm, be beneficial to man)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(silkworm, be helpful to humans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(silkworm, be beneficial to man)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(silkworm, be helpful to humans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(silkworm, be beneficial to man)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(silkworm, be helpful to humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(silkworm, be helpful to humans)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(silkworm, be beneficial to man)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(silkworm, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(silkworm, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(insect, be beneficial to man)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(aphid, is harmful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dung beetle, is harmful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(silkworm, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(insect, be beneficial to man)