silo: exist in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.53
, building
Weight: 0.50
Siblings eiffel tower
Weight: 0.34
, barn
Weight: 0.34
, chimney
Weight: 0.34
, tower
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
exist in business 1.00
be bad for business 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(silo, exist in business)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(silo, exist in business)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(silo, exist in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(silo, be bad for business)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(silo, exist in business)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(silo, be bad for business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(silo, exist in business)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(silo, be bad for business)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(silo, exist in business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(silo, be bad for business)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(silo, exist in business)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(silo, exist in business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(silo, exist in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(silo, exist in business)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(silo, exist in business)