simple: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.59
, word
Weight: 0.54
, figure
Weight: 0.53
, vendor
Weight: 0.53
, place
Weight: 0.53
Siblings proper noun
Weight: 0.32
, pure
Weight: 0.31
, essence
Weight: 0.31
, plain
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality bad 0.90
be better than complex 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(simple, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vendor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(simple, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(vendor, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(vendor, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(simple, has quality better)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(vendor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(simple, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(simple, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(simple, has quality bad)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(simple, has quality bad)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(simple, has quality bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(simple, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(simple, be better than complex)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(simple, be better than complex)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(simple, be better than complex)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(simple, be better than complex)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(simple, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(simple, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vendor, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(vendor, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(simple, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)