simpsons: has quality influence

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.70
, show
Weight: 0.63
, cartoon
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.60
, television show
Weight: 0.59
Siblings smallville
Weight: 0.38
, sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.37
, spongebob squarepants
Weight: 0.37
, cnn
Weight: 0.37
, las vegas
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality influence 1.00
is bad influence 0.91
has quality good 0.77
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality influence)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality influence)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality influence)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(game, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(game, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(smallville, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(smallville, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(cartoon, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(smallville, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(smallville, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sherlock holmes, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sherlock holmes, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(smallville, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(smallville, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(simpsons, has quality influence)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, is bad influence)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(simpsons, is bad influence)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(simpsons, is bad influence)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(simpsons, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(simpsons, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(simpsons, is bad influence)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(simpsons, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(simpsons, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(simpsons, has quality influence)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(smallville, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(smallville, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sherlock holmes, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cartoon, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(simpsons, has quality influence) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)