singer: be more open than selective singers

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents performer
Weight: 0.68
, writer
Weight: 0.65
, musician
Weight: 0.65
, star
Weight: 0.64
Siblings bob dylan
Weight: 0.65
, pianist
Weight: 0.64
, sarah vaughan
Weight: 0.61
, rapper
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more open than selective singers 1.00
become singers 0.81
be more popular than females 0.78
be more famous than actors 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(singer, be more open than selective singers)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(singer, become singers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(singer, become singers)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(singer, become singers)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(singer, be more popular than females)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(singer, be more famous than actors)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(singer, be more popular than females)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(singer, be more famous than actors)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(singer, be more popular than females)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(singer, become singers)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(singer, be more popular than females)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(singer, be more famous than actors)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(singer, be more famous than actors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(singer, be more open than selective singers)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(singer, be more open than selective singers)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(singer, be more open than selective singers)