single: has quality better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.61
, feature
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.47
, product
Weight: 0.47
, family
Weight: 0.44
Siblings double
Weight: 0.33
, triple
Weight: 0.32
, pop
Weight: 0.32
, second
Weight: 0.32
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality better 1.00
has quality bad 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(single, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(triple, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(single, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(triple, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(triple, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(single, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(single, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(single, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(single, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(single, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(single, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(single, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(single, has quality bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(single, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(single, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(single, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(single, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(single, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(single, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(single, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(single, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(triple, has quality bad)