sitcom: have laughing in background

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tv show
Weight: 0.65
, television show
Weight: 0.63
, content
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.47
Siblings cheer
Weight: 0.53
, episode
Weight: 0.36
, soap opera
Weight: 0.35
, soap
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have laughing in background 1.00
use laughing 0.89
have background laughter 0.87
using laugh track 0.77
use laugh track 0.77
have laugh tracks 0.76
use laugh tracks 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tv show, have laugh tracks)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sitcom, have laughing in background)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(tv show, have laugh tracks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(tv show, have laugh tracks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(tv show, have laugh tracks)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(sitcom, have laughing in background)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(sitcom, have laughing in background)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use laughing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(sitcom, have background laughter)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sitcom, use laughing)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(sitcom, have background laughter)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laughing)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sitcom, have background laughter)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sitcom, using laugh track)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use laugh track)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(sitcom, have laugh tracks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sitcom, use laugh tracks)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(sitcom, using laugh track)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(sitcom, use laugh track)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sitcom, have laugh tracks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(sitcom, use laugh tracks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sitcom, using laugh track)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laugh track)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sitcom, use laugh tracks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sitcom, have laugh tracks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, using laugh track)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laugh track)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have laugh tracks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laugh tracks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have background laughter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, use laughing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have laughing in background)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sitcom, have laughing in background)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tv show, have laugh tracks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sitcom, have laughing in background)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(tv show, have laugh tracks)