size: be different in different stores

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.63
, limit
Weight: 0.60
, option
Weight: 0.59
, characteristic
Weight: 0.58
Siblings diameter
Weight: 0.65
, aperture
Weight: 0.62
, rectangle
Weight: 0.61
, weight
Weight: 0.60
, gallon
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different in different stores 1.00
have different 0.82
be different in places 0.79
have different areas 0.77
feel heavier at different gyms 0.77
have different area 0.76
be different from value 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(rectangle, have different areas)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(rectangle, have different area)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(rectangle, have different area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(rectangle, have different area)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(rectangle, have different areas) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(rectangle, have different areas)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(size, be different in different stores)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(size, have different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(size, have different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(size, have different)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(size, have different)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(size, be different in different stores)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(size, be different in different stores)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(rectangle, have different area)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(size, be different in different stores) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(rectangle, have different areas)