skate: be good for shave

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents equipment
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, event
Weight: 0.49
, foot
Weight: 0.48
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.32
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.32
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.32
, ice cube
Weight: 0.31
, hockey
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for shave 1.00
causes get good at it 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skate, be good for shave)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(skate, be good for shave)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(skate, be good for shave)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(skate, causes get good at it)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skate, be good for shave)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(skate, causes get good at it)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(skate, be good for shave)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(skate, causes get good at it)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(skate, be good for shave)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(skate, causes get good at it)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Salient(skate, be good for shave)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(skate, be good for shave)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(skate, be good for shave)

Typical implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(skate, be good for shave)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(skate, be good for shave)