skate: is fucking expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents equipment
Weight: 0.50
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, event
Weight: 0.49
, foot
Weight: 0.48
Siblings skating
Weight: 0.34
, ice skating
Weight: 0.33
, hockey game
Weight: 0.32
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.32
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is fucking expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(skate, is fucking expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(skate, is fucking expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equipment, is expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(ice skating, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(hockey stick, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skate, is fucking expensive)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(equipment, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skate, is fucking expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(hockey stick, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hockey stick, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(ice skating, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(ice skating, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(skate, is fucking expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(skate, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(skate, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(skate, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skate, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(skate, is fucking expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(ice skating, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hockey stick, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(equipment, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(skate, is fucking expensive)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)