skier: downhill hit flags

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents competitor
Weight: 0.48
, person
Weight: 0.47
, user
Weight: 0.45
, sportsman
Weight: 0.45
, traveler
Weight: 0.44
Siblings athlete
Weight: 0.31
, one person
Weight: 0.31
, cyclist
Weight: 0.31
, swimmer
Weight: 0.31
, elderly person
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
downhill hit flags 1.00
hit flags 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(skier, downhill hit flags)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(skier, downhill hit flags)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(skier, downhill hit flags)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(skier, hit flags)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(skier, downhill hit flags)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(skier, hit flags)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(skier, downhill hit flags)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(skier, hit flags)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(skier, downhill hit flags)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(skier, hit flags)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(skier, downhill hit flags)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(skier, downhill hit flags)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(skier, downhill hit flags)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(skier, downhill hit flags)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(skier, downhill hit flags)