skillet: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents cooking utensil
Weight: 0.63
, band
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.58
, pan
Weight: 0.53
Siblings frying pan
Weight: 0.37
, wok
Weight: 0.37
, microwave oven
Weight: 0.37
, toaster oven
Weight: 0.37
, saucepan
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality better 0.83
has quality bad 0.82
has quality use 0.81
is value 0.79
lose quality over time 0.78
be on csgolounge valued 0.77
be valued in terms 0.77
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pan, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(skillet, has quality worth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pan, is value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(skillet, has quality worth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(skillet, has quality worth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(band, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(skillet, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(skillet, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(skillet, has quality worth)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(skillet, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(band, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(band, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pan, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pan, is value)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(pan, has quality better)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pan, is value)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(band, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(cooking utensil, has quality use)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(frying pan, is value)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(saucepan, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(wok, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pan, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skillet, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(band, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skillet, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(pan, is value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skillet, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(band, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skillet, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skillet, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skillet, has quality worth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cooking utensil, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(skillet, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(wok, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(wok, has quality good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(saucepan, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(saucepan, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(saucepan, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(saucepan, has quality better)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(saucepan, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(saucepan, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(microwave oven, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(frying pan, is value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(frying pan, is value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(skillet, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(skillet, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(band, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pan, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pan, is value)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(saucepan, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(wok, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(saucepan, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(saucepan, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(microwave oven, has quality bad)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(frying pan, is value)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality use)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cooking utensil, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(band, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(band, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(pan, has quality better)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(pan, is value)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(skillet, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)