skim milk: go bad faster than 2 % milk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dairy product
Weight: 0.71
, milk
Weight: 0.63
, beverage
Weight: 0.58
, ingredient
Weight: 0.58
, product
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chocolate milk
Weight: 0.40
, coconut milk
Weight: 0.38
, powdered milk
Weight: 0.38
, milk chocolate
Weight: 0.37
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad faster than 2 % milk 1.00
be worse than milk 0.87
be cheaper than milk 0.87
is better then milk 0.87
be cheaper than whole milk 0.87
go faster bad 0.86
is better milk 0.86
be worse than whole milk 0.86
be than milk 0.86
be healthier than normal milk 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chocolate milk, be cheaper than milk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chocolate milk, be cheaper than milk)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(chocolate milk, be cheaper than milk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(skim milk, go faster bad)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(skim milk, be than milk)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(skim milk, go faster bad)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(skim milk, go faster bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(skim milk, be worse than milk)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(skim milk, be than milk)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(skim milk, be cheaper than milk)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(skim milk, is better then milk)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(skim milk, be than milk)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(skim milk, be worse than milk)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, go faster bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(skim milk, be cheaper than whole milk)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(skim milk, be cheaper than milk)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(skim milk, is better milk)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(skim milk, is better then milk)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(skim milk, be cheaper than whole milk)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(skim milk, be worse than whole milk)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(skim milk, is better milk)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(skim milk, be healthier than normal milk)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(skim milk, be worse than whole milk)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(skim milk, be healthier than normal milk)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(skim milk, be worse than milk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(skim milk, is better then milk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(skim milk, be cheaper than milk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(skim milk, is better milk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(skim milk, be cheaper than whole milk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(skim milk, be worse than whole milk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(skim milk, be healthier than normal milk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, be worse than whole milk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, be worse than milk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, be cheaper than whole milk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, be cheaper than milk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, be healthier than normal milk)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, is better then milk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, is better milk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, be than milk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(skim milk, go bad faster than 2 % milk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(chocolate milk, be cheaper than milk)