skink: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lizard
Weight: 0.55
, reptile
Weight: 0.47
, name
Weight: 0.45
, animal
Weight: 0.44
, amphibian
Weight: 0.33
Siblings iguana
Weight: 0.34
, toad
Weight: 0.34
, monitor lizard
Weight: 0.34
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.34
, frog
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
have blue tails 0.86
lose tails 0.86
drop tails 0.85
has physical part legs 0.85
has physical part tongues 0.80
has physical part tongue 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(iguana, drop tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part legs)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(iguana, drop tails)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(iguana, drop tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(frog, has physical part legs)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part legs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(skink, have blue tails)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part legs)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(skink, lose tails)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(skink, drop tails)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, drop tails)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(skink, drop tails)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(skink, drop tails)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part legs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(skink, lose tails)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(skink, lose tails)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(skink, lose tails)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(skink, have blue tails)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(skink, have blue tails)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(skink, have blue tails)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(iguana, drop tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part legs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(skink, has physical part tails)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)