skink: has physical part tongue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents lizard
Weight: 0.55
, reptile
Weight: 0.47
, name
Weight: 0.45
, animal
Weight: 0.44
, amphibian
Weight: 0.33
Siblings iguana
Weight: 0.34
, toad
Weight: 0.34
, monitor lizard
Weight: 0.34
, komodo dragon
Weight: 0.34
, frog
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tongue 1.00
has physical part tongues 0.91
have blue tongue 0.89
has physical part legs 0.81
have blue tongues 0.78
has physical part tails 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(lizard, have blue tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tongue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(lizard, have blue tongues)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have blue tongues)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part legs)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(lizard, have blue tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(lizard, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(komodo dragon, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(frog, has physical part tongues) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(frog, has physical part legs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part legs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part tongue)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(skink, have blue tongue)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part legs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(skink, have blue tongues)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part legs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part legs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part tongues)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tails)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(skink, has physical part tails)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part legs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(skink, have blue tongue)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(skink, has physical part tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(skink, have blue tongue)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(skink, have blue tongues)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(skink, have blue tongues)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(skink, have blue tongue)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(skink, have blue tongues)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(skink, has physical part tongue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lizard, have blue tongues)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, has physical part tongue)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(komodo dragon, has physical part tails)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part tongues)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part legs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(lizard, has physical part tails)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(lizard, have blue tongues)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.03
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(skink, has physical part tongue) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)