skirmish: be in same queue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fight
Weight: 0.47
, battle
Weight: 0.46
, event
Weight: 0.42
, opportunity
Weight: 0.41
Siblings confrontation
Weight: 0.29
, assault
Weight: 0.29
, collision
Weight: 0.29
, encounter
Weight: 0.29
, contest
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in same queue 1.00
be in queue 0.97
is queue 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(event, is queue)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(skirmish, be in same queue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(event, is queue)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(event, is queue)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(event, is queue)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(skirmish, be in same queue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(skirmish, be in same queue)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(skirmish, be in queue)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(skirmish, be in queue)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(skirmish, be in queue)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(skirmish, be in queue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(skirmish, be in same queue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(skirmish, be in same queue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(event, is queue)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(skirmish, be in same queue)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(event, is queue)