skrill: is reliable

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents deposit
Weight: 0.36
, method
Weight: 0.35
, world
Weight: 0.33
, service
Weight: 0.31
, payment
Weight: 0.25
Siblings algorithm
Weight: 0.24
, escort service
Weight: 0.24
, extraction
Weight: 0.24
, strategy
Weight: 0.24
, service station
Weight: 0.24

Related properties

Property Similarity
is reliable 1.00
is accurate 0.82
is more accurate 0.81
is trustworthy 0.80
is efficient 0.79
is more efficient 0.78
is trusted 0.77
is most effective 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(method, is most effective)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(skrill, is reliable)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(method, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(skrill, is reliable)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(skrill, is reliable)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(method, is accurate)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(method, is more accurate)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(method, is most effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(method, is more accurate)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(method, is most effective)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(method, is accurate)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is efficient)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(extraction, is more efficient)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(method, is most effective)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(skrill, is reliable)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(method, is accurate)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(skrill, is reliable)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(method, is more accurate)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(skrill, is reliable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(extraction, is efficient)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(extraction, is efficient)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(extraction, is more efficient)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(extraction, is more efficient)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(skrill, is reliable)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(skrill, is trustworthy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(skrill, is trusted)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(skrill, is trustworthy)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(skrill, is trusted)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(skrill, is trustworthy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(skrill, is trusted)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is trustworthy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is trusted)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(skrill, is reliable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(method, is accurate)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(method, is most effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(extraction, is more efficient)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(extraction, is efficient)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(method, is accurate)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(method, is more accurate)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(skrill, is reliable)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(method, is most effective)