skunk: run in rodes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.74
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, species
Weight: 0.58
, mammal
Weight: 0.57
Siblings raccoon
Weight: 0.38
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37
, squirrel
Weight: 0.37
, fox
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
run in rodes 1.00
run in circles 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(skunk, run in rodes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(skunk, run in rodes)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(skunk, run in rodes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(skunk, run in circles)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(skunk, run in rodes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(skunk, run in circles)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(skunk, run in rodes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(skunk, run in circles)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(skunk, run in rodes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(skunk, run in circles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(skunk, run in rodes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(skunk, run in rodes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(skunk, run in rodes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(skunk, run in rodes)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(skunk, run in rodes)