skyscraper: be banned in washington dc

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.67
, office building
Weight: 0.61
, monument
Weight: 0.50
, architecture
Weight: 0.49
, landmark
Weight: 0.47
Siblings space needle
Weight: 0.56
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.37
, tower
Weight: 0.36
, clock tower
Weight: 0.35
, empire state building
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be banned in washington dc 1.00
be banned in france 0.82
be in seattle 0.76
is utah 0.76
be in york 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monument, is utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(landmark, be banned in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(landmark, be banned in france)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(monument, is utah)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(landmark, be banned in france)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(monument, is utah)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(empire state building, be in york)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(space needle, be in seattle)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(landmark, be banned in france) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monument, is utah) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(empire state building, be in york) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(empire state building, be in york)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(space needle, be in seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(space needle, be in seattle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(landmark, be banned in france)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(monument, is utah)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(space needle, be in seattle)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(empire state building, be in york)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(landmark, be banned in france)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(skyscraper, be banned in washington dc) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(monument, is utah)