skyscraper: were needed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.67
, office building
Weight: 0.61
, monument
Weight: 0.50
, architecture
Weight: 0.49
, landmark
Weight: 0.47
Siblings space needle
Weight: 0.56
, eiffel tower
Weight: 0.37
, tower
Weight: 0.36
, clock tower
Weight: 0.35
, empire state building
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
were needed 1.00
is needed 0.93
were made 0.79
were difficult 0.78
be is looked after today 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(architecture, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(skyscraper, were needed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(monument, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(skyscraper, were needed)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(architecture, is needed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(monument, were made)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(monument, were made)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(architecture, is needed)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tower, were difficult)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tower, be is looked after today)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(architecture, is needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(skyscraper, were needed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(monument, were made) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(skyscraper, were needed)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(tower, be is looked after today) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(tower, be is looked after today)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tower, were difficult) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tower, were difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(skyscraper, were needed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(skyscraper, were needed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(architecture, is needed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(monument, were made)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(tower, be is looked after today)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(tower, were difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(architecture, is needed)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(skyscraper, were needed) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(monument, were made)