slack: be better than hipchat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.46
, time
Weight: 0.42
, tool
Weight: 0.38
, resource
Weight: 0.34
, event
Weight: 0.33
Siblings pick
Weight: 0.29
, pressure point
Weight: 0.29
, pace
Weight: 0.29
, rebound
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than hipchat 1.00
be better than teams 0.87
has quality better 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(slack, be better than hipchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(slack, be better than hipchat)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(slack, be better than hipchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(slack, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(slack, be better than hipchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(slack, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(slack, be better than hipchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(slack, be better than teams)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(slack, be better than hipchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(slack, be better than teams)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(slack, be better than hipchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(slack, has quality better)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(slack, be better than hipchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(slack, be better than teams)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(slack, be better than hipchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(slack, be better than teams)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(slack, be better than hipchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(slack, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(slack, be better than hipchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(slack, be better than hipchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(slack, be better than hipchat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(slack, be better than hipchat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(slack, be better than hipchat)