slave: be treated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents african
Weight: 0.61
, character
Weight: 0.58
, act
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bondage
Weight: 0.60
, servant
Weight: 0.59
, frederick douglass
Weight: 0.58
, serf
Weight: 0.52
, equal
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
be treated 1.00
is treated 0.99
were treated 0.96
be treated now 0.95
were treated in caribbeans 1800 0.95
were treated in 1800s 0.95
were treated in 1789-1797 0.95
were treated in 1600s 0.95
were treated in 1700 0.95
were treated in 1860 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(device, be treated)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(slave, be treated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(device, be treated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(device, be treated)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(servant, were treated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(device, be treated)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(slave, be treated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(servant, were treated)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(servant, were treated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(slave, be treated)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(slave, were treated in 1860)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(slave, be treated now)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(slave, were treated)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(slave, were treated)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(slave, were treated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(slave, were treated)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(slave, be treated now)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(slave, be treated now)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(slave, be treated now)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(slave, were treated in 1860)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(slave, were treated in 1860)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(slave, were treated in 1860)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(slave, be treated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(slave, be treated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(device, be treated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(servant, were treated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(slave, be treated)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(device, be treated)