slave: were treated in 1860

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents african
Weight: 0.61
, character
Weight: 0.58
, act
Weight: 0.58
, device
Weight: 0.57
Siblings bondage
Weight: 0.60
, servant
Weight: 0.59
, frederick douglass
Weight: 0.58
, serf
Weight: 0.52
, equal
Weight: 0.48

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated in caribbeans 1800 1.00
were treated in 1800s 1.00
were treated in 1789-1797 1.00
were treated in 1600s 1.00
were treated in 1700 1.00
were treated in 1860 1.00
were treated 1.00
were treated during 1800s 0.96
were treated good 0.96
were treated bad 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(servant, were treated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(servant, were treated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(slave, were treated in 1860)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(slave, were treated)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(slave, were treated)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(slave, were treated bad)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(slave, were treated)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(slave, were treated bad)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(slave, were treated bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(slave, were treated bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(slave, were treated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(slave, were treated in 1860)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(slave, were treated in 1860)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(slave, were treated in 1860) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(servant, were treated)