slavery: was beneficial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sin
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.67
, evil
Weight: 0.62
, institution
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.61
Siblings genocide
Weight: 0.35
, torture
Weight: 0.34
, segregation
Weight: 0.34
, nazism
Weight: 0.34
, idolatry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was beneficial 1.00
be beneficial to society 0.87
was important in 2008 0.80
is harmful 0.79
was good 0.77
is effective 0.76
was positive thing 0.76
was successful 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sin, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(slavery, was beneficial)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sin, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sin, is harmful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(torture, is effective)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(sin, is harmful)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(slavery, was beneficial)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(torture, is effective)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(torture, is effective)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(segregation, was good)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(segregation, was good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(slavery, was beneficial)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was successful)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(slavery, was successful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(slavery, was good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(slavery, was successful)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(slavery, was good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(slavery, was successful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(slavery, was good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was beneficial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(slavery, was beneficial)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(sin, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(torture, is effective)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(segregation, was good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Typical(slavery, was beneficial)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(sin, is harmful)