slavery: was important in south

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sin
Weight: 0.68
, atrocity
Weight: 0.67
, evil
Weight: 0.62
, institution
Weight: 0.62
, crime
Weight: 0.61
Siblings genocide
Weight: 0.35
, torture
Weight: 0.34
, segregation
Weight: 0.34
, nazism
Weight: 0.34
, idolatry
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in south 1.00
was important to south 1.00
was important to north 0.99
was important to people in south 0.96
was defeted in south 0.96
was in south 0.96
was in north 0.94
was in west 0.93
was used in south 0.93
was in south popular 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(slavery, was important in south)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(slavery, was in south)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(slavery, was important to south)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(slavery, was in north)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(slavery, was important to south)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(slavery, was in south)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(slavery, was used in south)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(slavery, was in south)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(slavery, was important to people in south)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(slavery, was defeted in south)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(slavery, was in north)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(slavery, was important to people in south)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(slavery, was in north)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(slavery, was used in south)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(slavery, was important to south)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(slavery, was defeted in south)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(slavery, was used in south)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(slavery, was important to people in south)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was important to people in south)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(slavery, was defeted in south)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was important to south)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was defeted in south)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was in south)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was in north)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was used in south)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(slavery, was important in south)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(slavery, was important in south)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(slavery, was important in south)