sleeping: be bad for back

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.55
, need
Weight: 0.55
, function
Weight: 0.54
, necessity
Weight: 0.53
Siblings sleep
Weight: 0.34
, couch
Weight: 0.32
, nap
Weight: 0.32
, breathing
Weight: 0.32
, living
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for back 1.00
be good for back 0.96
be on bad 0.90
be bad extacy 0.88
is long bad 0.85
is too long bad 0.83
is late bad 0.83
is too bad 0.82
is early good 0.81
has quality bad 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(living, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(nap, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(living, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(living, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sleep, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sleep, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(nap, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(nap, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be good for back)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be good for back)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(sleeping, be good for back)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sleeping, be good for back)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is early good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is late bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sleeping, is early good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is early good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sleeping, is late bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is too bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sleeping, be on bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be on bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is late bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sleeping, is too bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sleeping, be on bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be on bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(sleeping, is early good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sleeping, is late bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is too bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sleeping, is too bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(living, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nap, has quality bad)