sleeping: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents time
Weight: 0.55
, need
Weight: 0.55
, function
Weight: 0.54
, necessity
Weight: 0.53
Siblings sleep
Weight: 0.34
, couch
Weight: 0.32
, nap
Weight: 0.32
, breathing
Weight: 0.32
, living
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
be bad extacy 0.86
be on bad 0.85
is long bad 0.84
is too long bad 0.80
is too bad 0.80
be bad for back 0.79
is late bad 0.78
feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(time, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(living, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(nap, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sleep, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sleep, feel good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nap, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(couch, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(nap, feel good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(time, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(living, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(living, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(sleep, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sleep, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(couch, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(couch, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nap, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(nap, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(nap, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(nap, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sleep, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(sleep, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(nap, feel good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(nap, feel good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(sleep, feel good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sleep, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(sleeping, be bad for back)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be bad for back)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be bad for back)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(sleeping, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(sleeping, is long bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(sleeping, be on bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is long bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sleeping, be bad extacy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sleeping, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sleeping, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sleeping, is late bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sleeping, is too bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is late bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(sleeping, be bad for back)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, is too bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sleeping, be on bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, be on bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(sleeping, be on bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sleeping, feel good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is long bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(sleeping, feel good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is late bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sleeping, is too long bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sleeping, is long bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sleeping, is too bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(sleeping, feel good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sleeping, is too bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(sleeping, is late bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(living, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sleep, feel good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(nap, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sleep, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(couch, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(nap, feel good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(nap, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(sleeping, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(time, has quality good)