slope: be in himalayan region covered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, property
Weight: 0.57
, attribute
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ridge
Weight: 0.33
, sand dune
Weight: 0.33
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.33
, elevation
Weight: 0.33
, fairway
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in himalayan region covered 1.00
be in region covered 0.94
be in himalayan region 0.93
be in region 0.81
have covered with thick layers of sediment containing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(area, have covered with thick layers of sediment containing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(slope, be in himalayan region covered)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(area, have covered with thick layers of sediment containing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(area, have covered with thick layers of sediment containing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(area, have covered with thick layers of sediment containing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(slope, be in himalayan region covered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(slope, be in himalayan region covered)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(slope, be in region covered)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(slope, be in himalayan region)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(slope, be in region covered)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(slope, be in region)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(slope, be in himalayan region)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(slope, be in himalayan region)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(slope, be in region covered)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(slope, be in region)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(slope, be in himalayan region)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(slope, be in region)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(slope, be in region covered)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(slope, be in region)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(slope, be in himalayan region covered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(slope, be in himalayan region covered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(area, have covered with thick layers of sediment containing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.63
Typical(slope, be in himalayan region covered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(area, have covered with thick layers of sediment containing)