slope: be in region covered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.59
, factor
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, property
Weight: 0.57
, attribute
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ridge
Weight: 0.33
, sand dune
Weight: 0.33
, salt lake city
Weight: 0.33
, elevation
Weight: 0.33
, fairway
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in region covered 1.00
be in himalayan region covered 0.94
be in region 0.85
be in himalayan region 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(slope, be in region covered)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(slope, be in himalayan region covered)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(slope, be in himalayan region)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(slope, be in region)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(slope, be in himalayan region covered)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(slope, be in himalayan region)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(slope, be in region)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(slope, be in region)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(slope, be in region)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(slope, be in himalayan region)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(slope, be in himalayan region covered)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(slope, be in himalayan region covered)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(slope, be in himalayan region)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(slope, be in region covered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(slope, be in region covered)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(slope, be in region covered)