sloth: adapt to environment

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, species
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, beast
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapt to environment 1.00
adapt to rainforest 0.82
adapt in rainforest 0.82
be adapted 0.78
adapt in tropical rainforest 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(monkey, adapt in rainforest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lizard, adapt to rainforest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be adapted)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(lizard, be adapted)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(lizard, be adapted)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(monkey, adapt in rainforest)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(monkey, adapt in rainforest)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(lizard, adapt to rainforest)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lizard, adapt to rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(sloth, adapt to environment)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt in rainforest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt in tropical rainforest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be adapted)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sloth, adapt in tropical rainforest)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sloth, adapt in rainforest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(sloth, adapt to rainforest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sloth, be adapted)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sloth, adapt in tropical rainforest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(sloth, be adapted)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sloth, adapt in rainforest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sloth, be adapted)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sloth, adapt in rainforest)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sloth, adapt in tropical rainforest)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sloth, adapt to environment)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(monkey, adapt in rainforest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lizard, adapt to rainforest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(lizard, be adapted)