sloth: adapt to rainforest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, species
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, beast
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapt to rainforest 1.00
adapt in rainforest 1.00
adapt in tropical rainforest 0.95
live in rainforest 0.90
live in tropical rainforest 0.89
be important for ecosystem of rainforest 0.87
adapt to environment 0.82
survive in rain forests 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mammal, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(mammal, live in rainforest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mammal, live in rainforest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(animal, live in rainforest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(monkey, adapt in rainforest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lizard, adapt to rainforest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(mammal, live in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(monkey, adapt in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(monkey, adapt in rainforest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(monkey, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(lizard, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lizard, adapt to rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(sloth, adapt to rainforest)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sloth, adapt in rainforest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(sloth, adapt in tropical rainforest)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt in tropical rainforest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sloth, adapt in tropical rainforest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(sloth, adapt in tropical rainforest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt in rainforest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sloth, adapt to environment)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sloth, adapt in rainforest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(sloth, adapt in rainforest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in tropical rainforest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sloth, adapt to environment)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sloth, live in tropical rainforest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sloth, live in rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(sloth, live in tropical rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(sloth, adapt to environment)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sloth, be important for ecosystem of rainforest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(sloth, live in tropical rainforest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(sloth, live in rainforest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sloth, live in rainforest)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sloth, survive in rain forests)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(sloth, survive in rain forests)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(sloth, live in rainforest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sloth, be important for ecosystem of rainforest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be important for ecosystem of rainforest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(sloth, survive in rain forests)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sloth, survive in rain forests)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(sloth, be important for ecosystem of rainforest)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mammal, live in rainforest)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(monkey, adapt in rainforest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lizard, adapt to rainforest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(mammal, live in rainforest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(sloth, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, live in rainforest)