sloth: be at amazon basin

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, animal
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.49
, mammal
Weight: 0.48
, sin
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lizard
Weight: 0.36
, gnome
Weight: 0.35
, monkey
Weight: 0.35
, chipmunk
Weight: 0.35
, tortoise
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at amazon basin 1.00
be at amazon 0.88
be at amazon rainforest 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at amazon)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at amazon)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(monkey, be at amazon)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at amazon)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(lizard, be at amazon)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at amazon)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sloth, be at amazon basin)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(sloth, be at amazon)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at amazon)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazon)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(sloth, be at amazon)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazon rainforest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazon basin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.07
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(sloth, be at amazon basin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(lizard, be at amazon)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(sloth, be at amazon basin)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(monkey, be at amazon)